Sunday, August 22, 2010

Difference Between Red And White Cricket Ball

Does Transparency Council to oversee public companies?

This issue is being discussed in various fora.

For businesses, information is particularly valuable competitive advantage. For example, withhold the salaries of its top executives to avoid the risk of competition entice you with fantastic deals. This explains why some of them have deployed an aggressive legal strategy aimed at preventing an increase in standards of transparency. Because public, public enterprises are subject to certain requirements of transparency active (in very particular conditions described in article ten-ordinal-law 20 285). Are they also subject to control for the Council for Transparency on, in general, public services?

While the Council has considered competent, sparking legal challenges that have been taken even before the Constitutional Court, the Comptroller decided a few days ago, on the contrary, the Council has no such competition, as legal texts are expressly attributed it as it was necessary to be binding on public companies ( Opinion No. 44462 of August 5, 2010 ). Attended

another important recent innovation administrative case law, this solution may be tensile even non-business organizations, as set up forms of private law (eg., Corporations), in which the State has pre-eminence due to its monetary contributions. Among other things, is CIMM game status, Sercotec or Cyrene (despite what it think). So require, says Comptroller with a somewhat cryptic formula, "the basic management principles of public law themselves, one of which is, indeed, that of transparency."

0 comments:

Post a Comment